Photon attenuation parameters for some tissues from Geant4 simulation, theoretical calculations and experimental data: A comparative study

doi:10.1007/s41365-019-0617-z

Nuclear Science and Techniques ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 96 doi: 10.1007/s41365-019-0617-z

• NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY,RADIOCHEMISTRY,RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE • Previous Articles Next Articles

Photon attenuation parameters for some tissues from Geant4 simulation, theoretical calculations and experimental data: A comparative study

Halil Arslan

Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Sakarya University of Applied Sciences, Sakarya, Turkey

Received:2018-09-28 Revised:2018-12-10 Accepted:2018-12-28
Contact: Halil Arslan E-mail:harslan@sakarya.edu.tr

Export Citation

Halil Arslan. Photon attenuation parameters for some tissues from Geant4 simulation, theoretical calculations and experimental data: A comparative study.Nuclear Science and Techniques, 2019, 30(6): 96 doi: 10.1007/s41365-019-0617-z

Citations

Altmetrics

Abstract

Abstract: Mass attenuation coefficients, effective atomic numbers, effective electron densities and Kerma relative to air for adipose, muscle and bone tissues have been investigated in the photon energy region from 20 keV up to 50 MeV with Geant4 simulation package and theoretical calculations. Based on Geant4 results of the mass attenuation coefficients, the effective atomic numbers for the tissue models have been calculated. The calculation results have been compared with the values of the Auto- Z_eff program and with other studies available in the literature. Moreover, Kerma of studied tissues relative to air has been determined and found to be dependent on the absorption edges of the tissue constituent elements.

Key words: Attenuation coefficient, Effective atomic number, Geant4 simulation, Tissue model

[1]	Reza Bagheri, Ali Yousefi, Seyed Pezhman Shirmardi. Study on gamma-ray attenuation characteristics of some amino acids for ¹³³Ba, ¹³⁷Cs, and ⁶⁰Co sources [J]. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 2020, 31(2): 19-19.
[2]	Hao Cheng, Bao-Hua Sun, Li-Hua Zhu, Tian-Xiao Li, Guang-Shuai Li, Cong-Bo Li, Xiao-Guang Wu, Yun Zheng. Intrinsic background radiation of LaBr₃(Ce) detector via coincidence measurements and simulations [J]. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 2020, 31(10): 99-99.
[3]	Xue-Dou Su, Gao-Long Zhang, Shou-Ping Xu, Wei-Wei Qu, Lin Song, Yu-Hua Huang, Ben Wang, Yi-Feng Wang, Ze-Tao Zhang, Wu-Fu Xu, Ming-Li Wang. Attenuation coefficients of gamma and X-rays passing through six materials [J]. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 2020, 31(1): 3-3.
[4]	F. Akman, O. Agar, M.R. Kaçal, M.I. Sayyed. Comparison of experimental and theoretical radiation shielding parameters of some greener alternative products [J]. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 2019, 30(7): 110-110.
[5]	Mohammad W. Marashdeh, Hanan Saleh. Mass attenuation coefficient of olive peat material for absorbing gamma ray energy [J]. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 2019, 30(7): 106-106.
[6]	Yong-Li Liu, Qing-Xian Zhang, Jian Zhang, Hai-Tao Bai, Liang-Quan Ge. Quantitative energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence analysis for unknown samples using full-spectrum least-squares regression [J]. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 2019, 30(3): 52-52.
[7]	Chaoming SUN, Youping SHENG, Jiqiang GE, Kaihua SUN. Experimental analysis on equivalent attenuation coefficients of steel [J]. Nuclear Techniques, 2019, 42(11): 110201-110201.
[8]	Bulent Buyuk. Preparation and characterization of iron-ore-imbedded silicone rubber materials for radiation protection [J]. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 2018, 29(9): 135-135.
[9]	LIU Bin, LI Lan, LYU Huanwen, XIAO Feng, JING Futing, YING Dongchuan, WEI Shuping, TANG Songqian, YANG Junyun. Simulation study on source terms generated by recoil protons of the primary loop of pressurized water reactor [J]. Nuclear Techniques, 2018, 41(4): 40604-040604.
[10]	M. Hassanzadeh, S. M. Sadat Kiai. Calculation of photon attenuation coefficient and dose rate in concrete with the addition of SiO2 and MnFe2O4 nanoparticles using MCNPX code and comparison with experimental results [J]. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 2018, 29(11): 152-152.
[11]	M.I. Sayyed, F. Akman, I.H. Ge?ibesler, H.O. Tekin. Measurement of mass attenuation coefficients, effective atomic numbers, and electron densities for different parts of medicinal aromatic plants in low-energy region [J]. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 2018, 29(10): 144-144.
[12]	He Dong, De-Qing Fang, Chen Li. Study on the performance of a large-size CsI detector for high energy γ-rays [J]. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 2018, 29(1): 7-7.
[13]	L.Seenappa, H.C. Manjunatha, K.N. Sridhar, Chikka Hanumantharayappa. Gamma and X-ray radiation compatibility of Ti–Ta–Hf–Zr alloys used for coronary stent applications [J]. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 2018, 29(1): 3-3.
[14]	LIU Bin, HU Huasi, LYU Huanwen, LI Lan. Continuation calculation methods of GEANT4 and its application in optimization design of GRH system [J]. Nuclear Techniques, 2017, 40(7): 70401-070401.
[15]	ZHANG Xiaowen, YAO Ya, YI Cheng, LI Mi, YANG Rong, JIANG Tianjiao, YANG Sheng. Radiation shielding efficiency and optimization of concrete incorporated with bismuth oxide [J]. Nuclear Techniques, 2017, 40(6): 60201-060201.

Nuclear Science and Techniques

Photon attenuation parameters for some tissues from Geant4 simulation, theoretical calculations and experimental data: A comparative study

Abstract

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

10