脉冲激光模拟单粒子效应研究

doi:10.11889/j.0253-3219.2020.hjs.43.040201

Nuclear Techniques ›› 2020, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 40201-040201.doi: 10.11889/j.0253-3219.2020.hjs.43.040201

• ACCELERATOR, RAY TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS • Previous Articles Next Articles

Research on single event effects of pulsed laser simulation

Chenguang AN Heng ZHANG,Yi WANG,Cunhui LI,Zhou CAO,Xuan WEN,Yuxiong XUE

Science and Technology on Vacuum Technology and Physics Laboratory, National Key Laboratory of Materials Behavior and Evaluation Technology in Space Environment, Lanzhou Institute of Physics, Lanzhou 730000, China

Received:2019-12-10 Revised:2020-02-24 Online:2020-04-15 Published:2020-04-20
About author:ZHANG Chenguang ,male, born in 1993, graduated from Beihang University in 2014, focusing on space radiation effect and payload
Supported by:
National Key Laboratory of Materials Behavior and Evaluation Technology in Space Environment

Abstract

Abstract: Background

Pulsed laser haa been widely used in the research of single particle effects (SEE) in integrated circuits and devices. Compared with heavy ion sources, it is easier to obtain spatial and temporal information through pulsed laser-induced SEE.

Purpose

This study aims to compare the linear energy transfer (LET) of SEE in silicon devices between single-photon and two-photon.

Methods

The differences of LET were compared by formula derivation and experimental comparison. Three kinds of silicon devices, i.e., differential comparator, static random access memory (SRAM) and bipolar junction transistor, were taken as design under test (DUT) units for both the single-photon absorption (SPA) and two-photon absorption (TPA) experiments.

Results

The different processes of SPA and TPA induced single particle effect are verified, and comparison results show that there is a quantitative relationship between energy and LET.

Conclusions

It is reasonable to have different equivalence relations between energy and LET. SPA and TPA need different LET values in single particle effect.

Key words: Single event effects, Pulsed laser, Single photon, Two-photon, LET

CLC Number:

TL99

Chenguang AN Heng ZHANG, Yi WANG, Cunhui LI, Zhou CAO, Xuan WEN, Yuxiong XUE. Research on single event effects of pulsed laser simulation[J].Nuclear Techniques, 2020, 43(4): 40201-040201.

Figures/Tables 11

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

References 15

1	Habing D H. The use of lasers to simulate radiation-induced transients in semiconductor devices and circuits[J]. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 1965, 12(5): 91-100. DOI: 10.1109/tns.1965.4323904. doi: 10.1109/tns.1965.4323904
2	Buchner S, Wilson D, Kang K, et al. Laser simulation of single event upsets[J]. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 1967, 34(6): 1227-1233.
3	McMorrow D. Characteristics and applications of pulsed laser-induced single-event effects[M]. Radiation Effects on Integrated Circuits and Systems for Space Applications, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019: 61-81. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-04660-6_4. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-04660-6_4
4	Roche N, Dusseau L, Boch J, et al. Correlation of dynamic parameter modification and ASET sensitivity in a shunt voltage reference[J]. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 2012, 59(6): 2756-2763. DOI: 10.1109/tns.2012.2224127. doi: 10.1109/tns.2012.2224127
5	Boulghassoul Y, Buchner S, McMorrow D, et al. Investigation of millisecond-long analog single event transients in the LM6144 Op Amp[J]. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 2004, 51(6): 3529-3536. DOI: 10.1109/tns.2004.839196. doi: 10.1109/tns.2004.839196
6	Douin A, Pouget V, Darracq F, et al. Influence of laser pulse duration in single event upset testing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 2006, 53(4): 1799-1805. DOI: 10.1109/tns.2006.880939. doi: 10.1109/tns.2006.880939
7	Weulersse C, Bezerra F, Miller F, et al. Probing SET sensitive volumes in linear devices using focused laser beam at different wavelengths[J]. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 2008, 55(4): 2007-2012. DOI: 10.1109/radecs.2007.5205576. doi: 10.1109/radecs.2007.5205576
8	Chugg A M, Jones R, Moutrie M, et al. Probing the charge-collection sensitivity profile using a picosecond pulsed laser at a range of wavelengths[J]. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 2002, 49(6): 2969-2976. DOI: 10.1109/tns.2002.805553. doi: 10.1109/tns.2002.805553
9	Melinger J S, McMorrow D, Campbell A B, et al. Pulsed laser-induced single event upset and charge collection measurements as a function of optical penetration depth[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1998, 84(2): 690-703. DOI: 10.1063/1.368124. doi: 10.1063/1.368124
10	McMorrow D, Lotshaw W T, Melinger J S, et al. Subbandgap laser-induced single event effects: carrier generation via two-photon absorption[J]. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 2002, 49(6): 3002-3008. DOI: 10.1109/tns.2002.805337. doi: 10.1109/tns.2002.805337
11	McMorrow D, Lotshaw W T, Melinger J S, et al. Three-dimensional mapping of single-event effects using two photon absorption[J]. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 2003, 50(6): 2199-2207. DOI: 10.1109/tns. 2003.820742. doi: 10.1109/tns. 2003.820742
12	Zhao W, Guo X, Chen W, et al. Temporal characteristic analysis of single event effects in pulse width modulator[J]. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 2017,28:92. DOI: 10.1007/s41365-017-0254-3. doi: 10.1007/s41365-017-0254-3
13	Zhang Z, Huang Y, En Y, et al. Investigation of maximum proton energy for qualified ground-based evaluation of single-event effects in SRAM devices[J]. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 2019, 30: 47. DOI: 10.1007/s41365-019-0570-x. doi: 10.1007/s41365-019-0570-x
14	Yang W, Yin Q, Li Y, et al. Single-event effects induced by medium-energy protons in 28 nm system-on-chip[J]. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 2019, 30: 151. DOI:10.1007/s41365-019-0672-5. doi: 10.1007/s41365-019-0672-5
15	Xu J, Chen S, Song R, et al. Analysis of single-event transient sensitivity in fully depleted silicon-on-insulator MOSFETs[J]. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 2018, 29: 49. DOI: 10.1007/s41365-018-0391-3. doi: 10.1007/s41365-018-0391-3

[1]	Wankui YANG, Baoxin YUAN, Huan HUANG, Guanbo WANG, Songbao ZHANG. Impact analysis of basic burnup cross section on coupled calculation of neutron transport burnup [J]. Nuclear Techniques, 2020, 43(4): 40004-040004.
[2]	Yulong CAI, Yudong LI, Lin WEN, Qi GUO. Progress of single event effects and hardening technology of CMOS image sensors [J]. Nuclear Techniques, 2020, 43(1): 10502-010502.
[3]	JIANG Bing, YAO Zeen, WEN Wei, HE Tie, ZHAO Guangyi, AN Li. Preparation of liquid scintillation sample for lithium carbonate pellet for tritium production rate measurement [J]. Nuclear Techniques, 2018, 41(9): 90503-090503.
[4]	TAN Jie, ZHANG Peng. Comparison and analysis of several typical algorithms in solving depletion equations [J]. Nuclear Techniques, 2018, 41(3): 30501-030501.
[5]	ZHANG Chenguang, AN Heng, YANG Shengsheng, MIAO Yujun, XUE Yuxiong, CAO Zhou. Experimental study on single event effects for CMOS APS with heavy ions [J]. Nuclear Techniques, 2018, 41(11): 110501-110501.
[6]	SUN Kun, XIONG Chao, GE Liangquan, ZHANG Qingxian, HE Qingju, WANG Meng, GU Yi. Line unit correction method of airborne gamma-ray spectrum anomaly information based on wavelet transform [J]. Nuclear Techniques, 2018, 41(10): 100501-100501.
[7]	YIN Shiyu, MA Lishuang, QIAN Sen, GAO Feng, ZHU Yao, WANG Zhigang, NING Zhe, WANG Zhile, CHEN Pengyu, YUAN Binhuan. The response characteristics of bi-alkali photocathode PMT to infrared light [J]. Nuclear Techniques, 2018, 41(1): 10401-010401.
[8]	FENG Quansheng, XU Bo, PAN Deng, ZOU Yang, XU Hongjie. Thermal-hydraulics numerical analyses of molten salt pebble-bed reactor core inlet [J]. Nuclear Techniques, 2017, 40(9): 90601-090601.
[9]	AN Heng, YANG Shengsheng, MIAO Yujun, XUE Yuxiong, CAO Zhou, WANG Jun, ZHANG Chenguang. Simulation of characteristic of charge collecting for CMOS APS with single event effects [J]. Nuclear Techniques, 2017, 40(7): 70502-070502.
[10]	JIANG Bing, XIA Li, AN Li, WEN Wei, HE Tie, ZHANG Jie, LI Jianyi, DING Yanyan, MA Zhanwen, HUANG Zhiwu, WANG Junrun, LU Xiaolong, YAO Zeen. Preparation method of liquid scintillation sample for tritium production rate measurement based on lithium carbonate pellet with aluminum foil coat [J]. Nuclear Techniques, 2017, 40(6): 60202-060202.
[11]	ZHANG Hengquan, LI Jia, ZHU Qingjun, WU Yuxiao, NIE Xingchen. A solution to “long history” in the method of GVR based on weight window [J]. Nuclear Techniques, 2017, 40(12): 120602-120602.
[12]	LIU Xiaomin, JIANG Huiqiang, WANG Zhiyu, LIU Tong, CHEN Hua, WANG Liping, YU Faxin. Development of radiation tolerance evaluation and measurement system for spaceborne D/A converter [J]. Nuclear Techniques, 2016, 39(11): 110401-110401.
[13]	HUANG Zhanchang, YANG Jianlun. Decay time characteristics of plastic scintillator [J]. Nuclear Techniques, 2015, 38(6): 60203-060203.
[14]	HE Jun, YUE Junhui, CAO Jianshe, TAO Ye. Bunch purity measurement system for BEPCII [J]. Nuclear Techniques, 2015, 38(5): 50103-050103.
[15]	LI Lei, TUO Xianguo, LIU Mingzhe, SHI Rui, WANG Jun. Smoothing and evaluation of spectrum based on TI-DWT-MSSNF [J]. Nuclear Techniques, 2014, 37(12): 120203-120203.

Research on single event effects of pulsed laser simulation

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 15

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0