氟盐冷却球床堆与HTR-10和MSRE的定量相似性分析

doi:10.11889/j.0253-3219.2016.hjs.39.010601

Nuclear Techniques ›› 2016, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 10601-010601.doi: 10.11889/j.0253-3219.2016.hjs.39.010601

• NUCLEAR ENERGY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING • Previous Articles Next Articles

Quantitative similarity analysis of the fluoride salt-cooled pebble bed reactor with HTR-10 and MSRE

YANG Qun, YU Shihe, ZOU Yang, ZHOU Bo, YAN Rui, XU Hongjie

Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Jiading Campus, Shanghai 201800, China

Received:2015-10-28 Revised:2015-11-19 Online:2016-01-10 Published:2016-01-14
Supported by:
Supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No.XDA0201002), the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai(No.11JC1414900)

Abstract

Abstract:

Background: The fluoride salt-cooled pebble bed reactor which has not yet been built so far is a new international research reactor, so the selection of similar reactors with operation experience as benchmark is one important part of the applicability analysis for its reactor core nuclear design software. Purpose: This study aims to determine quantitatively the rationality of the 10 MW high-temperature gas-cooled test reactor (HTR-10) and the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment (MSRE) to be the benchmarks for the fluoride salt-cooled pebble bed reactor. Methods: The similarities of the fluoride salt-cooled pebble bed reactor with HTR-10 and MSRE were analyzed with the adoption of the similarity analysis software that is often used. Results: The results show that the fluoride salt-cooled pebble bed reactor and MSRE have a high similarity because they have the close spectrum peak energies and almost the same elements in core. The fluoride salt-cooled pebble bed reactor and HTR-10 have the different coolant and more differences in spectrum peak energies, hence the low similarity. Conclusion: MSRE is an ideal benchmark of the reactor core nuclear design software for the fluoride salt-cooled pebble bed reactor.

Key words: Fluoride salt-cooled pebble bed reactor, Nuclear design, Quantitative similarity, MSRE, HTR-10

CLC Number:

TL329

YANG Qun, YU Shihe, ZOU Yang, ZHOU Bo, YAN Rui, XU Hongjie. Quantitative similarity analysis of the fluoride salt-cooled pebble bed reactor with HTR-10 and MSRE[J].Nuclear Techniques, 2016, 39(1): 10601-010601.

References

1 Robertson R C. MSRE design and operation report Part I: description of reactor design[R]. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1965. DOI: 10.2172/4654707

2 GEN-IV international forum. GIF R&D outlook for generation IV nuclear energy systems[R]. France: OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, 2009

3 Massimiliano F. Development and applications of methodologies for the neutronic design of the Pebble Bed Advanced High Temperature Reactor (PB-AHTR)[R]. Berkeley: University of California, 2008

4 Ingersoll D T, Forsberg C W. Overview and status of the advanced high-temperature reactor[A]. Proceeding of ICAPP06[C]. Reno, NV USA, 2006: 6264

5 Forsberg C W, Peterson P F, Kochendarfer R A. Design options for the advanced high-temperature reactor[A]. Proceedings of ICAPP08[C]. Anaheim, CA USA, 2008: 8026

6 Broadhead B L, Hopper C M, Parks C V. Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses applied to criticality safety validation[R]. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1999

7 Rearden B T. Tsunami-3d: control module for three-dimensional cross-section sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for criticality[R]. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2011

8 Rearden B T, Jessee M A. Tsunami utility modules[R]. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2011

9 经荥清, 杨永伟, 古玉祥, 等. HTR-10初次临界装料预估[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 41(4): 116-119. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0054.2001.04.028 JING Xingqing, YANG Yongwei, GU Yuxiang, et al. Prediction calculation of HTR-10 fuel loading for the first criticality[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2001, 41(4): 116-119. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn: 1000-0054.2001.04.028

10 杨群, 邹杨, 于世和, 等. 熔盐冷却球床堆核数据不确定性对K∞的影响[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2013, 47(增刊2): 678-682. DOI: 10.7538/yzk.2013.47.S1.0678 YANG Qun, ZOU Yang, YU Shihe, et al. Effect of nuclear data uncertainty on K∞ in molten salt cooled pebble bed reactor[J]. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2013, 47(Suppl 2): 678-682. DOI: 10.7538/ yzk.2013.47.S1.0678

11 田嘉夫. 先进的规则床模块式高温气冷堆概念[J]. 核科学与工程, 2008, 28(2): 147-157. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn: 0258-0918.2008.02.010 TIAN Jiafu. Advanced ordered bed modular HTGR reactor concept[J]. Chinese Journal of Nuclear Science and Engineering, 2008, 28(2): 147-157. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0258-0918.2008.02.010

[1]	ZHANG Luyu, WANG Zhimin, BAI Huaiyong, CHEN Jinxiang, ZHANG Guohui. Simulation of the core configuration schemes for the AP1000 reactor by the Monte Carlo code [J]. Nuclear Techniques, 2017, 40(4): 40604-040604.
[2]	CAI Jun, XIA Xiaobin, CHEN Kun, MEI Mudan. Study of fluid fuel influence on delayed neutron in Molten Salt Reactor [J]. Nuclear Techniques, 2014, 37(03): 30603-030603.
[3]	ZHANG Zhihong, XIA Xiaobin, ZHU Xingwang, CAI Jun. Source terms calculation for the MSRE with on-line removing radioactive gases [J]. Nuclear Techniques, 2014, 37(02): 20603-020603.

Quantitative similarity analysis of the fluoride salt-cooled pebble bed reactor with HTR-10 and MSRE

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 3

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10